User login
Author Information
Poll
Why have you visited this website?
To check for updates
11%
Read posts
39%
Contribute to discussions
6%
Share content
3%
Social media brought me here
6%
Tis fate
35%
Total votes: 632
Active forum topics
Recent blog posts
Upcoming Events
- 5 May 2024 - 11:00 to 16:30
Quick Links
Who's online
There are currently 0 users online.
You must have joined when I wasn't that active thus missed the post about you being Bengali.
You're the first Bengali I know from 'up north'.
it's yashmaki.
That name rings a bell....
Just a simple question
How should the nikaah go? what happens in it? can anyone just tell me how the muslim wedding ceremony go? because i recently realised that i had NO idea how a nikaah go. just that the walimah is the big party.
Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
Check this out.
It mentions the procedures for nikah along with the sunnah's and some evidences.
IMO not a very good answer.
It does not break things out into "this is a must, without it the nikah is invalid" and "this is a good sunnah practice, but without it, the nikah is still valid".
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
The response answers the question as to how nikah should be done according to the sunnah. But it doesn't distinguish between fard and sunnah acts.
but it mentioned inviting the molvis around. Seems like a piece of self interest.
I read a hadith a while ago that after some battle, one of the sahabis was more eager than the others to return home, and in it the prophet
asked for the reason, and he mentioned that he had just recently got married.
The ahdith then went on onto other points etc, but the thing I remember thinking was "hang on... the Prophet
had not been invited?"
Ofcourse the prophet
may not have been in a convenient location or have had more important things to do such as da'wah... but it still struck me.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
does that include the long wedding dresses?
or is this hadith just for guys?
Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
isn't "out of pride" the most important words in that? :S
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
yep, and im thinking, if its not out of pride then its going to be detestable or something like that.
but the wedding dresses in movies!! do they fall under this cat? im htinking yes. not that i want to wear a dress like that for my wedding -.- i want a light blue dress
or maybe i'll just do the north-african tradition. change dress SEVEN times. hey! you only get married once (inshallah)
Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
Just wear a sari.
lol why a sari?
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
it is just for men.
there is NO WAY a saree is my main dress.
i value PRACTICALITY over all, sarees are NOT practical. die saree die!
Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
Apparently in the days of my parents/grandparents it was fashionable to have clothes that were 27 foot long...
(I am not sure if it was mentioned to be yards or feet... so I went with the smaller amount.)
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
Isn't that what a bride wears on her wedding day?
If you're Indian [and bengali?]
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Pages