[color=indigo][b]Seriously???

Subhan'allah thats wickd! I just cant wait for it to open!!! [/b][/color]

We all hear about men beating up their partners....

Quote:

10pm Today

Channel: Five

[b]Battered Men: Hidden Lives[/b]
Documentary, based on the dramatisation of one tragic, real-life story, exploring the taboo subject of female-to-male domestic violence. The story of one male victim is used as a case study to explore the scope and pattern of this abuse. Other male victims speak out about their experiences, and two reformed violent women offer their insights into the minds of the abuser, and what can be done to help

Duration: 65mins

"MuslimBro" wrote:

We all hear about men beating up their partners....

Quote:

10pm Today

Channel: Five

[b]Battered Men: Hidden Lives[/b]
Documentary, based on the dramatisation of one tragic, real-life story, exploring the taboo subject of female-to-male domestic violence. The story of one male victim is used as a case study to explore the scope and pattern of this abuse. Other male victims speak out about their experiences, and two reformed violent women offer their insights into the minds of the abuser, and what can be done to help

Duration: 65mins

Being abusive is a BIG no no. And it don't matter if the abuser is a male or female! It's down right wrong.

US has been planting fake news stories in Iraq newspapers and TV stations.

You know, the usual stuff :

"America is doing something wonderful for the Iraqi people."

Or,

"Insurgents are enemies of Iraq. Do not help them."

President Bush spends millions of dollars in bribes to
give the poor Iraqi journalists to print pro American articles.

Quote:

[b]Planted Propaganda[/b]

The Washington Post

Monday, October 23, 2006

[b]It's a bad idea, whether or not it violates regulations. Too bad the Pentagon won't say that.[/b]

THE DEFENSE Department inspector general has concluded that having a Pentagon contractor secretly pay Iraqi journalists and news organizations to run positive news stories about the war doesn't violate any laws or regulations. It's almost impossible to tell whether that conclusion is correct: The scanty, two-page summary released by the Pentagon provides no details about the activities of the contractor, the Lincoln Group, the contract under which it was operating or the applicable rules.

We won't dwell too long, though, on the irony that an assessment of the military's secret propaganda operations is itself -- except for the largely exculpatory conclusion -- secret. The more important point is that, assuming the inspector general's legal assessment is right, it only makes the problem worse. The U.S. government has a legitimate interest in conveying its point of view. The problem is when it does so in secret. The government shouldn't be in the business of covertly peddling propaganda -- especially in a war based on the notion of seeking to export democratic values such as, say, a free press.

But don't just take it from us. Take it from, among others, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace, who criticized the program in comments to the Los Angeles Times in March. "I think there are ways to get your message out, but get it out in a form that people understand how the message got there," Gen. Pace said. "They need to know that, so they can make their own judgment about what they believe and don't believe in the article. The worst thing you can have is people feeling like somehow they've been snookered."

Or take it from Defense Secretary Donald M. Rumsfeld, who told PBS's Charlie Rose in February, "When we heard about it, we said, 'Gee, that's not what we ought to be doing.' " Or take it from Mr. Rumsfeld's former chief spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, who said in December of the inspector general's investigation, "If somebody comes back to me and says there's nothing wrong with the Department of Defense paying journalists, I'll say, 'Even if there's nothing wrong, does it make sense?' "

No, it doesn't. But when we called the Pentagon to determine its policy position, the response we received -- even after citing the statements of Mr. Rumsfeld and Gen. Pace -- reflected no understanding of that bedrock principle. "The current situation in Iraq necessitates that the coalition maintain the capability to communicate with the Iraqi people via the Iraqi media," the statement said. "A thorough investigation concluded that the U.S. followed established doctrine by paying to place truthful articles and advertisements in Iraqi newspapers. The IG report made no recommendations to the contrary." But making recommendations wasn't the inspector general's job. If this is "established doctrine," it needs swift reexamination.

[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/22/AR200610... Post[/url]

Can someone tell me who DON is? :? (seems one of the oldies have changed their names).

"Angel" wrote:

Can someone tell me who DON is? :? (seems one of the oldies have changed their names).

[color=indigo][b]DON?

What are you onabout?[/b][/color]

[b][color=indigo]O

Its sum1 called naS786.[/color][/b]

"Admin" wrote:

"Angel" wrote:

Can someone tell me who DON is? :? (seems one of the oldies have changed their names).

Dunno.

Can people please stick to their names. It makes it easier for me to shout at you then!

:twisted:

I think we had a thread for people changing their names they would post there so everyone would know who they are! :roll:

"Noor...*" wrote:

[b][color=indigo]O

Its sum1 called naS786.[/color][/b]

oh it's nas, he's not been on for ages, just curious who Don was..

[b]anybody familier with the Stalin defence strategy?[/b]

"TEX" wrote:

[b]anybody familier with the Stalin defence strategy?[/b]

Are you refering to his Blizkrieg strategy?

Coz thats a German strategy... not Soviet.

You gotta be more specific. He had quite a few strategies .... military and administrative.

sum1 sed that israel is using his strategy

by constantly expanding its boarders and slowly annihiliating the muslims

Who the hell is the MODERATE mod, more like the annoying one. He/she deleted one of my posts :evil:

[b]If you are referring to your post in the thread entitled 'Trials and Tribulations', unfair accusations were being thrown around about the new member Abdullah ibn Adam and all posts relating to this were edited.

- The Moderate Mod[/b]

there's lots of posts getting deleted or changed by mods for some reason. :? go on strike!

"zara" wrote:

go on strike!

u guys go on strike

and i will hijack :twisted:

Quote:

and i will hijack

and we'll come back to find about a hundred topics about isreal and america etc.

"TEX" wrote:

and i will hijack

[b][color=indigo]You already have..[/color][/b]

u luv me really

i know is only pretending 2 h8 me

i know ur motto :twisted:

[b]Edit: Have some respect for the sisters.
- The Moderate Mod[/b]

"TEX" wrote:

u luv me really

i know is only pretending 2 h8 me

i know ur motto :twisted:

that better have been for Noor...

[b][color=indigo]Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww u disgusting freek.

u make me SICK[/color][/b]

it was a joke!

LOL

[b][color=indigo]Joke or no joke u still make me SICK.

Get a life...[/color][/b]

:roll:

y do i make u sick?

[b][color=violet]...have a gooodd guess[/color][/b]

[b][color=indigo]Cant concentrate!!!!

Ahhhh!!!!!

Done no work this week!! Cant believe it and i've got to hand in one friggin assignment on monday!

Going to fail [/color][/b]

just fallen out with my sister need her help
big time stuck with my coursework dnt know wat to do
help!

"Bliss" wrote:

just fallen out with my sister need her help
big time stuck with my coursework dnt know wat to do
help!