Those who call on them intending "tawassul" cannot be blamed. As for someone who believes that those called upon can cause effects, benefit, or harm, which they create or cause to exist as Allah does, such a person is an idolator who has left Islam
It's the person's intention, if they think the dead person has the power to grant them their dua then this is clear shirk.
—
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Submitted by Bilan on 1 December, 2011 - 23:03 #62
ThE pOwEr Of SiLeNcE wrote:
I know I'm repeating what you probably read but
Those who call on them intending "tawassul" cannot be blamed. As for someone who believes that those called upon can cause effects, benefit, or harm, which they create or cause to exist as Allah does, such a person is an idolator who has left Islam
It's the person's intention, if they think the dead person has the power to grant them their dua then this is clear shirk.
but why else WOULD a person mention the dead person in their dua if they didnt think they would help their dua get answered? It would be pointless otherwise. I think it is very dangerous grounds.
—
"Verily, in the remembrance of Allah, do hearts find rest"
You don't seem to understand the point, and I don't know how to explain it.
Anyway, as I've said there's a difference of opinion, you should read into it yourself (not just skim) and make up your own decision. If you want to carry on believing it's dangerous grounds (without looking into further) then that's up to you
—
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
but why else WOULD a person mention the dead person in their dua if they didnt think they would help their dua get answered? It would be pointless otherwise. I think it is very dangerous grounds.
People use the example of what the sahabah did here to argue otherwise.
There is a specific dua where the prophet is asked for help which he taught to the sahabahs, and they continued to use this even after his passing.
Shirk is generally an issue of "do you believe that the power for this is from a source other than God?" If the answer to that question in any field is yes, it is shirk. If it isn't, it isn't.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
You don't seem to understand the point, and I don't know how to explain it.
Anyway, as I've said there's a difference of opinion, you should read into it yourself (not just skim)* and make up your own decision. If you want to carry on believing it's dangerous grounds (without looking into further) then that's up to you
* (and not just that article)
—
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Submitted by Bilan on 1 December, 2011 - 23:18 #66
ThE pOwEr Of SiLeNcE wrote:
You don't seem to understand the point, and I don't know how to explain it.
Anyway, as I've said there's a difference of opinion, you should read into it yourself (not just skim) and make up your own decision. If you want to carry on believing it's dangerous grounds (without looking into further) then that's up to you
smiley?
its late, but fine ill do some reading, though i dnt think there is much to understand just cos im not agreeing! (yet)
@admin do u mean the supplication mentioned in feefs post?
—
"Verily, in the remembrance of Allah, do hearts find rest"
EDIT - quick look, and I have come across those ahadith, dua from ahadith before too. They settled it for me when I looked into the issue yonks ago.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
You don't seem to understand the point, and I don't know how to explain it.
Anyway, as I've said there's a difference of opinion, you should read into it yourself (not just skim) and make up your own decision. If you want to carry on believing it's dangerous grounds (without looking into further) then that's up to you
smiley?
its late, but fine ill do some reading, though i dnt think there is much to understand just cos im not agreeing! (yet)
@admin do u mean the supplication mentioned in feefs post?
What about it? It wasn't meant to be passive aggressive, although I think that's how it came across. I genuniely meant you can believe whatever you want and since there is a difference of opinion, it's fine. But since you wanted to actually understand it, it's kinda silly to skim read on a subject which you're not familiar with and expect to understand it.
—
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Submitted by Foysol89 on 2 December, 2011 - 03:10 #69
The power of silence wrote:
What about it? It wasn't meant to be passive aggressive, although I think that's how it came across.
i'm not gonna lie that's how it always comes across with you... I don't know why. Lol
—
Lets reunite the ummah under one flag LA ILAHA IL ALLAH MUHAMMADUR RASULULLAH
I know copy and pasting isn't liked, but in this case I thought it'd be beneficial as sometimes people can be so lazy that they cbb to click on a link! And I thought if I broke the article down like this, it'd be easier to read.
yh..id liked to say thats true..but i canny lie
seconded.
asking someone's that's dead for intercession? but they are DEAD? and aint saints a thing christians do?
Christian sainthood is different - the word is just adopted because the overall idea resembles.
The Islamic idea for saint is "wali" meaning "friend of God" and this can be anyone and to an extent all Muslims are "friends of God" but some are closer to God than others.
The overall idea when and the theology behind shirk is if it takes power away from God, gives another source for power, or diminishes the status of God (in an insult, a partner etc), then that is shirk.
Now that can be asking someone else for help, dead or alive, or it could be as simple as eating a chocolate bar and thinking that the energy it gives is not originally from God.
The idea behind lesser intercession (as opposed to the one that happens on judgement day) is that is that power from outside the power of God? If your belief is that God has given an individual power to help, to intercede etc, then that cannot be shirk.
As for whether that is a good thing to do, that is a different debate, and here people make differnet arguments - and it should be remembered here that since there are ahadith involved, dont go for the words of an individual over the ahadith. What can be argued is the context of the ahadith etc, but what cannot be argued is "person X makes a good sounding argument so I will ignore the hadith".
On the issue of people calling shirk, the scholars will not call shirk, but that it can "lead to" shirk "if people do not understand what they are doing". Some battle this by pronouncing prohibitions, others battle this by saying that education is the cure.
—
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
What about it? It wasn't meant to be passive aggressive, although I think that's how it came across.
i'm not gonna lie that's how it always comes across with you... I don't know why. Lol
I thought I knew when I sounded passive aggressive, like the above post, and probably the post in the Surah kahf topic from yesterday - but you say 'always'? :/
—
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Submitted by Foysol89 on 3 December, 2011 - 09:19 #73
Okay not always........ :roll:
—
Lets reunite the ummah under one flag LA ILAHA IL ALLAH MUHAMMADUR RASULULLAH
I know I'm repeating what you probably read but
It's the person's intention, if they think the dead person has the power to grant them their dua then this is clear shirk.
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
but why else WOULD a person mention the dead person in their dua if they didnt think they would help their dua get answered? It would be pointless otherwise. I think it is very dangerous grounds.
"Verily, in the remembrance of Allah, do hearts find rest"
Anyway, as I've said there's a difference of opinion, you should read into it yourself (not just skim) and make up your own decision. If you want to carry on believing it's dangerous grounds (without looking into further) then that's up to you
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
People use the example of what the sahabah did here to argue otherwise.
There is a specific dua where the prophet
is asked for help which he taught to the sahabahs, and they continued to use this even after his
passing.
Shirk is generally an issue of "do you believe that the power for this is from a source other than God?" If the answer to that question in any field is yes, it is shirk. If it isn't, it isn't.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
* (and not just that article)
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
smiley?
its late, but fine ill do some reading, though i dnt think there is much to understand just cos im not agreeing! (yet)
@admin do u mean the supplication mentioned in feefs post?
"Verily, in the remembrance of Allah, do hearts find rest"
I haven't read fiif's post. :oops:
I am commenting on the general principle only.
EDIT - quick look, and I have come across those ahadith, dua from ahadith before too. They settled it for me when I looked into the issue yonks ago.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
What about it? It wasn't meant to be passive aggressive, although I think that's how it came across. I genuniely meant you can believe whatever you want and since there is a difference of opinion, it's fine. But since you wanted to actually understand it, it's kinda silly to skim read on a subject which you're not familiar with and expect to understand it.
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
The power of silence wrote:
Lets reunite the ummah under one flag LA ILAHA IL ALLAH MUHAMMADUR RASULULLAH
seconded.
asking someone's that's dead for intercession? but they are DEAD? and aint saints a thing christians do?
Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?
Christian sainthood is different - the word is just adopted because the overall idea resembles.
The Islamic idea for saint is "wali" meaning "friend of God" and this can be anyone and to an extent all Muslims are "friends of God" but some are closer to God than others.
The overall idea when and the theology behind shirk is if it takes power away from God, gives another source for power, or diminishes the status of God (in an insult, a partner etc), then that is shirk.
Now that can be asking someone else for help, dead or alive, or it could be as simple as eating a chocolate bar and thinking that the energy it gives is not originally from God.
The idea behind lesser intercession (as opposed to the one that happens on judgement day) is that is that power from outside the power of God? If your belief is that God has given an individual power to help, to intercede etc, then that cannot be shirk.
As for whether that is a good thing to do, that is a different debate, and here people make differnet arguments - and it should be remembered here that since there are ahadith involved, dont go for the words of an individual over the ahadith. What can be argued is the context of the ahadith etc, but what cannot be argued is "person X makes a good sounding argument so I will ignore the hadith".
On the issue of people calling shirk, the scholars will not call shirk, but that it can "lead to" shirk "if people do not understand what they are doing". Some battle this by pronouncing prohibitions, others battle this by saying that education is the cure.
"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.
I thought I knew when I sounded passive aggressive, like the above post, and probably the post in the Surah kahf topic from yesterday - but you say 'always'? :/
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Okay not always........ :roll:
Lets reunite the ummah under one flag LA ILAHA IL ALLAH MUHAMMADUR RASULULLAH
"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi
Pages