NO TOPIC
Well This is the new No Topic Topic. ๐
For those who do not know, this place is to talk about nothing. Nada. Zilch. And everything else which according to you does not deserve it's own topic.
The other one was getting a bit long, and was just full of bickering now.
So we have a new start.
The bickering in the Old no topic should not be carried over to here.
EDIT - go to NO TOPIC the Third.
Forum
NO TOPIC
Snoopz โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 02:37
:shock: was thinking the same..
just had one of those dreams that felt so real- cant sleep now
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 11:04
It must be springtime!
NO TOPIC
Sirus โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 11:49
regarding the sayed women marrying outside, theres nothing to say they cant do......but a lot of people tend not too, as to keep the lineage of the Beloved Prophet ๏ทบ going.
whether you believe thats important or not is up to you
but its not a rule
my sis is married to a syed so inshallah my nephews and nieces will be ๐
but his cousin, whos a sayed, has married a guy whos not...but no big deal!
and........
cant believe there was no prison break last night....all due to the stupid state of union address by Dubya last night :x
no point waking up on a tuesday morning if theres no prison break to watch
NO TOPIC
You โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 12:29
Way too cold.
NO TOPIC
Seraphim โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 15:24
Just close your eyes and pretend it's all just a bad dream. That's how I get by.
NO TOPIC
Amal โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 15:40
In Fiqh, one of the essential conditions to be considered for a valid nikah (ie marriage contract) is that the bride is married to a "suitable match" (kafa'a). What is considered "suitable" differs amongst the ulema, but includes things like faith, profession, wealth, chastity, health and lienage. This is based on the hadith that says (paraphrased) of if a suitable match comes and asks your daughter's hand in marriage, you should not refuse it.
Since something like lienage is considered a factor for suitability, it is a valid ground (for both the Wali and/or girl) upon which to refuse a suitor (ie a Sayed girl marrying a non-sayed boy) for marriage. The same case is not for a boy/groom (who can marry a non-sayed/non-Quraishi/non-Hashimi etc girl). (Some go to the extent of saying non-Arabs cannot marry Arabs.. but today there arent very many pure Arab blooded families that can trace their lienage back to the Prophet saw, which imo weakens this argument).
It needs to be remembered that even without these "suitability" factors, a nikah is legally valid, and to put it simply you *can* marry whom you want.
NO TOPIC
Seraphim โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 15:47
Isnt that what i said?
NO TOPIC
Amal โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 16:41
Thats looking at it at its most simplest. I was trying to explain the reasoning behind why some say you cannot marry a sayed etc.
I'll put it in another way.. The 4 Imams (Hanafi, Shafi' etc) place suitability (kafa'a) (ie lienage, education, profession etc) as a condition for a nikah contract to be valid.
This however doesnt make it a requirement. If the girl (and wali?) agree to marrying a person with different "suitability" factors (ie they make an exception), then the nikah is valid (and so they can marry whomsoever they want). Also, what is considered "suitable" is relative to each girl's own upbringing and environment. For example, a princess would not be considered "suitable" to marrying a pauper, but if she was agreeable etc, then she could.
And Allah swt knows best
NO TOPIC
Naz โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 18:52
Whats the difference between Miss and Ms?
NO TOPIC
Seraphim โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 19:04
ones a decent girl the others a cow
NO TOPIC
MuslimBro โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 19:24
NO TOPIC
You โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 19:49
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms.
NO TOPIC
Seraphim โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 19:50
I prefer my explanation...
NO TOPIC
Naz โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 20:36
Thank you Admin. At least someone is helpful.
Is it possible to tickle yourself?
(i know the answer to this ๐ )
If you state yes say how
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 22:51
do You like my new signature?
NO TOPIC
You โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 22:53
You don't have onelol
NO TOPIC
Funzo โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 22:56
Very nicee yaqub!
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 23:00
My signature doesn't display, can anyone else see it? Can you see your own signatures?
Up until now I haven't had one, because I never thought it was necessary to repeat something after every post, until now.
NO TOPIC
You โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 23:11
nope, can't see it. Is it using acceptable markup? (I don't think you can have html or images, but I may be wrong.)
Yes
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 23:28
Yay!
NO TOPIC
Noor โ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 - 23:36
Computer is extremely slow! :x
NO TOPIC
Noor โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 00:08
ordering a pizza, so hungry.
NO TOPIC
Joie de Vivre โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 02:14
Warning: long video, not funny
Good as it is to be open-minded when it comes to religious freedoms, I'm pretty sure we have to draw the line at Scientology.
NO TOPIC
You โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 02:33
I spoke to an athiest about Scientology. He thought that it was like all other religions... Something on the lines of "They are all quack".
NO TOPIC
Joie de Vivre โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 02:39
Be that as it may... they do seem like the basic definition of dangerous cult. Worth a wiki.
OK, on a lighter note. ๐
NO TOPIC
Naz โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 20:26
I take it no one knows.
The answer is yes. You can tickle yourself.
the roof (the top bit) inside your mouth!
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 20:34
o yeah! that's a good one.
next:
what are the three part of you body that you can touch with your left hand but can't with your right hand?
NO TOPIC
Naz โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 20:38
erm you can touch your right elbow with your left hand but not with your right hand.
Is that one?
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 20:39
yes! and the right fore-arm is the second one.
The third is applicable to Muslims only...
NO TOPIC
Ya'qub โ Wed, 30 Jan 2008 - 22:01
Church has Darth Vader 'gargoyle head' !!
http://www.cathedral.org/cathedral/discover/darth.shtml