A man arrived at the masjid carrying nothing but need and an ancient faith: that houses of worship exist for those whom life has abandoned, that communities claiming connection to the divine actually honor divine commands about mercy.

His request was simple. Direct. Money for survival. The transaction that should flow as naturally as water from those who have abundance to those facing drought.

The imam’s refusal was equally direct. “There’s a process,” he explained. Forms to complete. Committees to consult. Procedures that transform divine obligation into bureaucratic theater.

What happened next was the systematic destruction of a human soul desperate for grace.

First, a kiss to the imam’s forehead, a cultural gesture seeking to unlock mercy through respect. When respect failed, the hands came next, the universal language of supplication escalating the plea. Finally, the feet. A grown man kissing the ground where compassion should have stood, surrendering the last fragments of his dignity for scraps of help.

Each kiss was hope translated into humiliation. Each gesture revealed how completely we have corrupted divine instruction, replacing God’s immediate commands with our endless complications.

“I felt very uncomfortable,” the imam later confessed during his lecture on emotional intelligence, sharing this soul’s destruction as an example of challenging situations where community leaders might need support in processing difficult encounters.

Here’s what should make you uncomfortable: your system created this scene.

As he spoke, different discomfort carved itself into my chest. The sound of spiritual bankruptcy is so complete that it forces human beings to kiss feet for acknowledgment of their basic worthiness to exist.

That drowning man wasn’t manipulating anyone. He was performing increasingly desperate acts to penetrate bureaucratic armor with raw human need. And we made him do it.

You Are Not Allah’s Gatekeeper

Stop pretending you are.

When did you appoint yourself the quality control manager of Divine Mercy? When did you decide that Allah’s Provision requires your investigative approval before reaching His Creation?

What costs more, occasionally helping someone who might not have desperately needed it, or turning away someone who actually did?

Your price for being deceived: pocket change that won’t change your life. Their price for your refusal: death. Despair. The final decision that mercy doesn’t exist in this world.

You’ve deluded yourself into believing that protecting money from theoretical fraud justifies protecting yourself from actual human suffering.

They Shame You Daily

While you construct investigative committees and debate worthiness, Americans have revolutionized compassion through trust. GoFundMe has moved thirty billion dollars to people in crisis. No background checks. No worthiness tribunals. No humiliating applications.

Crisis gets posted. Money flows. Help arrives.

They respond with lightning efficiency while you deliberate with glacial bureaucracy, despite your possessing more explicit divine commands about immediate charity. They built highways to mercy while you constructed obstacle courses to protection.

Listen to your Quran’s clarity:

“And in their wealth is a recognized right for the needy and the deprived.” [Surah Adh-Dhariyat; 51:19]

A RIGHT. Not charity you graciously bestow after thorough investigation. Not assistance contingent on proving worthiness to your satisfaction. A right as fundamental and immediate as their need for oxygen.

You have perverted this divine right into a bureaucratic privilege, transforming what Allah made simple into what you made impossible.

Your Perverted Architecture

Ramadan fundraising operates like professional campaigns, raising millions through passionate appeals and competitive generosity. Building projects, conference funding, speaker fees, your money machinery runs with High precision when serving your institutional priorities.

Then Monday morning desperation knocks. That family facing eviction discovers your money requires different rules entirely. Poverty documentation. Weekly committee meetings. Urgent crisis transformed into patient waiting for your convenience.

The mathematics condemn you: Muslim Americans pour 4.3 billion dollars annually into charity, yet homeless families sleep in parking lots while you debate their documentation requirements.

The Prophet’s masjid featured dirt floors, yet permanently housed whoever needed shelter. Your marble palace develops procedural complications for temporarily helping anyone.

You’ve replaced sanctuary with bureaucracy, mercy with management, divine hospitality with human gatekeeping.

The Predators You Birthed

Your failures have consequences beyond slow help; they create hunting grounds for predators.

When official channels fail through endless committees and waiting, desperation seeks alternatives. Your inadequacy births exploitation targeting those you claim to serve.

“When you make legitimate help so difficult that people seek alternatives, you bear moral responsibility for every predator who fills the vacuum you created.” [PC:Nick Fewings (unsplash)]

Community members offer assistance while expecting inappropriate access or gratitude. But worse: individuals weaponize charity itself, positioning themselves as brokers between wealthy donors and desperate families, then wielding this borrowed power like medieval lords extracting tribute.

They demand public gratitude for others’ money. They create humiliation theater where recipients perform appreciation for strangers’ entertainment. They document their “generosity” on social media using funds they never earned to purchase social status they never deserved.

When resistance emerges, they deploy psychological warfare. Sighing about “ungrateful attitudes” during community gatherings. Manufacturing consensus against dissenters. Mobilizing desperate families (terrified of losing their lifeline) to attack anyone challenging the broker’s illegitimate authority.

They transform charity from liberation into social control, discovering that controlling assistance means controlling people. They command armies of the desperate, each family a weapon against the next who might resist.

This is your creation. When you make legitimate help so difficult that people seek alternatives, you bear moral responsibility for every predator who fills the vacuum you created.

Gaza Reveals Your Hypocrisy

Right now, millions flow toward Gaza through channels you know are imperfect. Military checkpoints extract tribute. International facilitators charge devastating commissions. Bureaucratic mazes delay aid while people starve. Twenty percent of donations might reach intended recipients if fortune smiles.

Yet you give urgently, accepting imperfection, understanding that crisis demands immediate response despite systemic complications.

Meanwhile, here in America, you spend weeks investigating whether the homeless man outside your masjid deserves twenty dollars for food.

You accept flawed efficiency for distant suffering while demanding perfect systems for local mercy. You understand that war complicates Gaza distribution, yet refuse to understand that poverty, addiction, and desperation create complications requiring immediate response rather than extended investigation.

Gaza mirrors your moral failure. You give to faraway crises with trust while bureaucratizing nearby mercy with suspicion.

The Divine Trap You Cannot Escape

When someone asks for help, Allah arranged that intersection. The Lord of all circumstances orchestrated this meeting of their need and your resources. He delivered them to your door specifically.

The Creator positions a person in need before you, and you respond with suspicion, investigation, or delay? You demand they prove to you what Allah has already authenticated by bringing them to your attention?

Every broken soul stumbling through your doors carries divine examination wrapped in human flesh: “Will you be My mercy on earth, or another reason to surrender hope?”

That struggling man isn’t failing his test by arriving imperfect. You are failing yours by demanding perfection before offering mercy.

Your Orders Are Simple

Emergency funds available same day. No exceptions. Dignified assistance, recognizing that asking for help has already cost them everything. Clear criteria published transparently.

But fundamentally: Give when someone asks. Give what you can afford to lose. Stop investigating backgrounds. Stop interrogating motives. Stop creating barriers between recognizing need and responding to it.

If someone deceives you, that becomes their account with Allah , not yours. Your spiritual record stays clean because you responded to apparent need with mercy.

Your Judgment Approaches

That man kissing the imam’s feet revealed your system’s moral bankruptcy. You have created structures so divorced from mercy that desperate people must perform degrading acts to access what should flow like rain.

The Prophet said:

“Whoever relieves a believer’s distress of the distressful aspects of this world, Allah will rescue him from a difficulty of the difficulties of the Hereafter.”

Every barrier you construct will be examined. Every delay you impose while people suffer will require accounting. Every humiliation you demand will be weighed against your own desperate need for mercy on the Day when no committee will deliberate your worthiness, and no process will delay divine judgment of how you responded when mercy was needed most.

Every day you delay, another soul learns that your masjid is where hope goes to die.

 

Related:

– Faith In Action: Zakat, Sadaqah, And Islam’s Role In Embracing Humanitarianism In A Globalized World

– [Podcast] A Riba-Free Future With A Continuous Charity | Faizan Syed

The post The Architecture of Withholding: When Charity Becomes Control appeared first on MuslimMatters.org.

Palestinians mourn over the bodies of loved ones as Israel continues to massacre hundreds.

In October 1973, Arab oil producers led by Saudi Arabia imposed an oil embargo on the United States and other nations backing Israel during the Yom Kippur War. That bold move triggered a global energy crisis and helped bring about a ceasefire. It was a rare moment of Arab assertiveness on the world stage.

Fast forward to today: Israel’s relentless bombardment of Gaza has killed more than 65,000* people—mostly women and children—according to humanitarian sources. A recent UN commission has even accused Israel of committing genocide. Yet, the Arab response has been largely symbolic. Statements of condemnation, calls for restraint, and summits filled with rhetoric have replaced meaningful action. The contrast with 1973 could not be starker.

Since that pivotal year, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries—Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman—have spent close to half a trillion dollars on Western weapons. According to estimates from the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database:

• Saudi Arabia: $150–200+ billion
• UAE: $50–80+ billion
• Qatar: $30–50+ billion
• Kuwait: $20–30+ billion
• Bahrain & Oman: $10–20+ billion (combined)

Yet, despite this massive investment, not a single GCC country has fired a weapon at Israel since 1973. The only direct military involvement by a Gulf state was a small Saudi contingent in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War—before the GCC even existed.

Meanwhile, Israel has not hesitated to strike targets in GCC countries. In September 2025, Israeli warplanes bombed a location in Doha, Qatar, targeting Hamas leaders and killing several Qatari citizens. This brazen act exposed the vulnerability of even the most well-armed Arab states and the hollowness of their strategic alliances.

So why do GCC countries continue to spend billions on weapons they never use against the region’s most aggressive actor? The answer lies in the geopolitical narrative shaped by Western powers. The USA and its allies have long portrayed Iran, Iraq, and other Shi’a-majority nations as the primary threats to Gulf stability. Western arms sales are marketed not just as tools of defense but as symbols of prestige and political alignment. 

Citizens are rarely told that these contracts often include restrictions on how and where the weapons can be used—especially against Israel. Using Western-supplied arms against Israel would likely trigger sanctions, loss of military support, and diplomatic fallout. GCC leaders are reminded of Iran’s fate since the fall of the Shah in 1979—a cautionary tale of defiance punished by isolation.

Even more troubling is the lack of protection these alliances offer. The United States, which maintains military bases across the Gulf, did not warn Qatari leaders about the impending Israeli strike in Doha. The so-called safety net proved worthless. The U.S. response was muted, and no action was taken against Israel. The message was clear: when Israel attacks, even America’s closest Arab allies are left exposed.

President Joe Biden has openly called Israel a “God-send” for the United States. He once remarked that if Israel didn’t exist, America would have to invent it. President Donald Trump is even more unabashed in his support for Israel. His daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner—a deeply connected Orthodox Jewish real estate mogul—played a central role in shaping Trump’s Middle East policy. Trump’s designation of Qatar as a Major Non-NATO Ally in 2022 did little to shield it from Israeli aggression. Qatari officials were informed of the airstrike only ten minutes after it occurred.

So what good are trillions of dollars in weapons if GCC countries won’t defend their own sovereignty, let alone protect Palestinians from Israeli aggression? Qatar didn’t retaliate. Instead, it convened a summit in Doha to discuss the attack.

The result? A familiar spectacle of unity and impotence.

Leaders from the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), joined by representatives from Indonesia to Senegal, gathered in Doha to express solidarity. The summit concluded with a strongly worded communique condemning Israel and reaffirming support for Qatar. But beyond the rhetoric, there were no sanctions, no diplomatic breaks, no economic pressure—just words.

It was a stark reminder that 0 + 0 + 0 + … + 0 still equals 0.

At the summit, Gulf leaders called on the United States to rein in Israel. Jasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi, Secretary General of the GCC, urged Washington to use its “leverage and influence” to stop Israeli aggression. But such appeals are increasingly disconnected from reality. Trump’s recent comment—“it’s up to Israel what it does in Gaza”—underscored the futility of expecting restraint from Washington.

Hours after the summit ended, Israeli forces launched a new ground offensive in Gaza City, undeterred by regional condemnation.

When will Arab leaders learn that they cannot rely on a fox to guard a henhouse? Appeasing and paying protection money to those who enable mass murder is not diplomacy—it’s complicity.

The Doha summit laid bare the limits of Arab diplomacy. Despite their oil wealth, modern infrastructure, and global investments, Gulf states have failed to convert economic power into political leverage. This impotence is not just a failure of strategy—it reflects a deeper structural weakness. Without the will or ability to challenge U.S. policy or impose costs on Israel, Arab states are left issuing statements that carry little weight.

As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza deepens and international outrage grows, the Arab world faces a moment of reckoning. Will it continue to rely on symbolic gestures and appeals to Western powers? Or will it rediscover the assertiveness it once wielded in 1973?

For now, the answer seems clear. The communique from Doha may have expressed solidarity, but it did nothing to stop the bombs from falling.

[* This number is a masked figure and reflects an estimated one-tenth of the actual scale, from research noting that “the actual death toll was likely much higher given the exclusion of non-trauma deaths resulting from the destruction of health care facilities, food insecurity, and lack of water and sanitation.”]

 

Related:

– 150 Muslim Leaders And Institutions Now Say Arab Muslim Nations Should Cancel Abraham Accords, Suspend Oil Sales, Close Airspace To Israel, And Send Diplomatic Aid Mission To Gaza

– What A Rubio: United States Throws Weight Behind Israel After Aggression On Qatar

The post 0+0+0 = 0 : The Empty Promise Of Arab Solidarity In Doha appeared first on MuslimMatters.org.

Suspicious short selling, a prime minister unwilling to form an independent commission, and revelations from the military suggests Israel’s story on 7 October is not the full picture.

Many who remained in the north for most of the genocide are being forced to flee.

Palestinians in the West Bank, who see European acknowledgments of statehood as symbolic, are increasingly confined to open-air prisons.