Democratic voters recognize reality of genocide as elected officials and mainstream media fall short.

When Ahmed Al-Sharaa addressed the United Nations on September 25th, he made history as the first Syrian president to do so in 60 years.

He also capped a remarkable string of successes that no human could have imagined when Bashar al-Assad was sitting pretty in Damascus a year ago.

A Long List of Accomplishments

In the nine months since Al-Sharaa’s rebel alliance shocked the world by toppling the Assad regime, his transition government has pulled off success after success amid mortal challenges.

He has maintained the loyalty of hardened fighters, some of whom were probably ready to string up former Assad officials and charge into the occupied Golan Heights.

He has struck interim deals with other rebel factions and, so far, avoided full-blown conflict with the Syrian Democratic Forces even as it stalls on integration.

He has signed an interim constitution that established a path to representative government, satisfied public expectations for governance rooted in Islam, and guaranteed religious freedom to Syria’s diverse population.

He has shown respect for various Islamic schools of thought and embraced Syria’s Christian, Druze, and Alawite citizens, consulting with their leaders and sending soldiers to protect their houses of worship.

He has built diplomatic ties with countries usually at odds with each other, like the UAE, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, avoiding the coup plots that doomed Egypt’s first democratically elected president, the late Dr. Mohamed Morsi.

He has defused multiple violent sectarian flare-ups instigated by separatist militias, Assad loyalists, and the Israeli government, all of whom seek to destabilize the government and ultimately partition the country.

He has condemned abuses by his own forces committed during those clashes and launched independent investigations into the violence.

He has secured multiple meetings with President Trump, who lifted executive branch sanctions on Syria without demanding that the country jump through years of hoops or make intolerable concessions, such as joining the so-called Abraham Accords.

The Muslim World’s Eyes On Syria

Now Al-Sharaa has made history at the United Nations. In his brief speech, he reintroduced Syria to the world, outlined his vision for the future, and concluded with support for the people of Gaza.

As the world now watches Syria’s progress with cautious optimism, Syrians are not the only ones rooting for his success.

So are many Muslims across the globe who have endured years of political heartbreak: Israel’s genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing of the West Bank, the rise of Hindutva extremism in India, the genocidal persecution of Uyghurs in China and Rohingya in Myanmar, civil wars in Libya, Yemen and Sudan, and renewed autocracy in Egypt and Tunisia.

The apparent victory of the Assad regime over Syrian revolutionaries was perhaps the most bitter pill for the Muslim world to swallow, and his sudden downfall was widely seen as a miracle.

If Al-Sharaa’s government now succeeds in reuniting, stabilizing, and reconstructing Syria, that, too, would be a miracle—one that could make the 42-year-old an inspiring political leader in the Arab and Muslim world for decades to come.

Al-Sharaa’s Syria vs. Israel

Perhaps that explains why the Israeli government has spent months trying to undermine Al-Sharaa by smearing him to Western audiences, destroying Syria’s military assets, lobbying the U.S. to maintain its sanctions, enabling separatist militias to rebel, and even threatening to assassinate Al-Sharaa himself.

Israel opposes Syria’s new government for the same reason it opposed the Arab Spring: it wants Syria and the wider Arab Muslim world internally divided, militarily weak, and politically impotent—ruled by dictators who keep a lid on the tens of millions of people who want their governments to reflect their values and stand up for the Palestinian people.

Benjamin Netanyahu recently justified bombing Syria by saying, “I understand who we are dealing with.” Indeed, Netanyahu sees in Al-Sharaa what many Muslims see: a devout, pragmatic warrior-turned-politician who managed to subdue extremist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, spearhead the overthrow of an entrenched dictator backed by a superpower, and restore Syria to its rightful place in the world, all in a few years.

To be clear, Al-Sharaa does have critics in the Muslim world, who usually accuse him of being a tool of the West or argue he has not done enough to help Gaza or respond to Israel’s attacks on Syria. Yet no one should be surprised by Al-Sharaa’s hostility to Iran and Hezbollah, given the sectarian violence they unleashed against the Syrian people to prop up the Assad regime, and no one should have expected his forces to somehow stop the Gaza genocide or jump into a war with Israel, given their limited military strength, unprotected airspace, and tenuous control of Syria.

What Al-Sharaa has done instead is repeatedly condemn Israel’s attacks on Gaza and refuse to join the Abraham Accords despite the Caesar sanctions that Israel First members of Congress still dangle over his government.

Although Al-Sharaa’s tenure has hardly been perfect and the future of Syria’s transition remains unclear, the Syrian people and Muslims around the world have reason to hope that he will continue to make history and maybe, just maybe, inspire other Arab Muslim nations to do the same.

 

Related:

– Fort Down In A Fortnight: Syrian Insurgents Oust Assad Regime

The post Is Syria’s New President The Type Of Political Leader Muslims Have Been Waiting For? appeared first on MuslimMatters.org.

We speak with Ahmed Abu Artema about surviving genocide and leaving behind everything, before fleeing to the Netherlands.

UVision sees genocide as a business opportunity.

Oakland groups protest 280 military cargo shipments to Nevatim Airbase in Israel.

Have you ever heard of the ‘trolley problem’? It’s a thought experiment involving two hypothetical scenarios that prompts us to examine our own morals and ethics, and has resulted in numerous variations. One offshoot of this classic dilemma is as follows: ‘If you were to press a button to win 5 million dollars but kill 5 people somewhere in the world, would you press it?’ This question forces you to shorten the distance between yourself and a ‘faraway’ problem. While many of us may easily disregard this particular quandary as unchallenging and fictional, how many of us could easily dismiss the real-life trolley problems we face?

In recent years, Temu, a Chinese online marketplace, has skyrocketed in popularity, not only in the United States but also in countries like my own, Sri Lanka. Ranked the world’s second-best e-commerce platform, it’s known for its rock-bottom prices, ridiculously high and frequent discounts, and for the sheer variety of products it offers. It can attract customers with high-end taste as well as those with an appetite for aesthetic gimcracks, many of which can be purchased in bulk for half the price found elsewhere. Sounds too good to be true? Well, if you have any qualms, the arrival of the vibrant orange package at your doorstep —the item inside in perfect condition— will immediately squash it. 

By design, Temu is meant to beguile you, and, true to its slogan, you can shop like a billionaire.  I’ll admit, I too, was convinced in the beginning; I bookmarked products I wanted to buy in the future, products that reflected my Pinterest boards, products I could customise – it was easy to fall in love with this marketplace. That compulsion, however, was soon stifled when I learnt of its dark secrets. How does a large marketplace like Temu maintain its appealing price tags? 

Temu and Forced Labour

Fast fashion often comes at the cost of something, and while many of us may direct our attention to its ill effects on the environment, the allure of Temu whitewashes its complicity in human rights abuses. 

East Turkestan (or its colonial name ‘Xinjiang’, which translates to ‘New Territory’) is a region at the center of grave human rights abuses, an annexed region in China, and home to Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities. These communities have been forced into labour by Chinese companies affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). In turn, the CCP disguises these camps as projects to ‘alleviate the province’s poverty’ and has displaced labourers to other areas, some as far as 2,600 miles away from home, to avoid import bans. 

Yet, despite these concerns, Temu does not have a system in place to vet products in its marketplace. The company has even admitted to not barring ‘third-party sellers from selling products based on their origin in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region’. To make matters worse, its parent company, PDD Holders, was once accused of mandating its employees “to work 380 hours per month, which resulted in several deaths”. But the issue of human rights abuses does not end there.

Genocide in East Turkestan

China’s campaign against these communities is all-encompassing, and, as pointed out by Uyghur intellectual and activist, Mamtimin Ala, there’s a problem when we narrow the discussion to just forced labour. It deflects from a wider conversation that China is committing a genocide. 

Uyghurs and the other ethnic groups have faced violent crackdowns for adhering to their religion or maintaining their cultural heritage and traditions. They face imprisonment for basic practices such as fasting during Ramadan, wearing the hijab, abstaining from alcohol, or even engaging with the Qur’an. A report by The Guardian exposed these abuses, like the example of a 70-year-old Uyghur woman who was arrested and given a six-year prison sentence for “studying the Qur’an between April and May 1967, wearing conservative religious dress between 2005 and 2014, and keeping an electronic Qur’an reader at home”. In another ludicrous case, an Uyghur woman was sentenced to prison for ten years for “illegally studying scripture with her mother for three days […] when she was just five or six years old”.

Muslim trainees work in a garment factory at the Hotan Vocational Education and Training Center in Hotan, Xinjiang, northwest China. (CCTV via AP Video, File)

These crackdowns are ultimately a result of China’s deep-seated fear — an inability to maintain totalitarian control over people: mind, body, and soul. But through intensive surveillance, fear is then inversely permeated within these communities. Such nauseating anxiety of being watched becomes a punishment in itself. “[Islam] has to be gone completely [for the CCP],” Uyghur activist Arslan Hidayat said, “so that [Uyghurs] are not able to implement it into their lives, when they’re making decisions about what to eat, when they’re making decisions about how to do business, how to interact with individuals, who they choose to marry, what they choose to wear.”

But it’s not just religion. Using their own language, lacking zeal when using Mandarin, or being absent from “flag-raising ceremonies” also puts them at risk. 

Isn’t there a cruel irony in all of this? Through our purchases, we rob people of their freedom of expression just so we can own products that pander to our taste.

With identity markers labelled as “extremism”, these individuals are thrown into horrific “re-education” detention camps, where human rights abuses are rampant. In a 45-page report published in 2022 by former UN human rights commissioner, Michelle Bachelet, abuses against Uyghurs include “beatings with electric batons while being strapped in a “tiger chair”” (chairs which captives are tied to and kept in painful positions) as well as subjugation to extended periods of solitary confinement. Other forms of torture include rape, forced sterilisation, forced disappearances, and organ harvesting. 

China allegedly plans to increase its organ transplant centres by 2030. This expansion ultimately means that there will be a total of nine organ transplant centres for a mere population of 26 million. That’s alarmingly excessive and should raise a lot of questions, especially when official records show that the region generally has a low donation rate. Contrast that ratio with the Guizhou province in China: the province, as highlighted by The Telegraph, has only three transplant centres for its population of 39 million. 

The Chairperson of the ‘End Transplant Abuse in China (ETAC)’ organisation has said, from marginalised prisoners alone, “[organs] were harvested forcefully, including from otherwise healthy prisoners against their will” and were sometimes done so while “the patients were still alive”.

Call to Action

When we bear witness to the Ummah’s suffering, what should our response be? 

To answer this, I’d like to highlight an incident that occurred during the life of Jabir ibn Abdullah .

It is reported that one day, Jabir was carrying some meat with him when he encountered Umar ibn al-Khattab . When the latter inquired about it, Jabir replied, “Amir al-Muminin. We desired meat, and I bought some meat for a dirham.” Umar then said, “Does one of you want to fill his belly apart from his neighbour or nephew? How can you overlook this ayat? ‘You squandered your good things in the life of this world and sought comfort in them.'”[Surah Al-Ahqaf: 46;20]

From this brief interaction, we observe how Umar   linked individual consumption with an awareness of the needs of others. Putting this into practice will undoubtedly instill a sense of contentment and empathy. But the lesson Umar conveys here can teach us a lot more and should shake us into introspection. If we are to be mindful of our purchases because others lack them, what can be said if our purchases directly affect them? 

It is not enough to simply acknowledge the atrocities committed against the Uyghurs. This would make no difference, especially when one is a contributor to that pain. The Prophet said,

“A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor.” [Sahih al-Bukhari 2442]

Hence, I believe it’s time we reject marketplaces like Temu. In fact, some of the ‘ulema are active proponents of boycott movements. Sheikh Abdullah ash-Shanqiti, for instance, has said that if we declare ‘we will not import [China’s] products until they stop mistreating Muslims, that will be beneficial for the Muslims. […] It is as if [Muslims] are unaware of what is beneficial for them. Their enemies plan for them, and they execute these plans. Therefore, look at this weakness and this failure.’ To not do so, Sheikh remarked, would be a wasted opportunity.

Since 2023, there has been a robust amplification of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestine. Unfortunately, while people tend to boycott the goods, they freeze the principles behind such a movement. Palestinian writer Muhammed el-Kurd once highlighted the importance of creating analogies for people to understand causes better and the connections between them. “The fault in a lot of what we do,” he said, “is that we tend to exceptionalise Palestine and we tend to exceptionalise Zionism.” The principles gained from the BDS movement must transcend one cause as they are grounded in solidarity with the oppressed and are against the imperial rule it presides over. 

So, in a full circle moment, we go back to the trolley problem. Are we really willing to purchase from Temu, knowing fully well that the one dress we bought could have been the cause of much pain and suffering to a ‘faraway’ Uyghur Muslim? 

 

Related:

– Understanding Boycotts And Buying Within Our Communities

– Top Books To Read On Uyghur Cause

 

The post Is Your Temu Package Made With Uyghur Forced Labour? appeared first on MuslimMatters.org.

Serbian nationals also accused by Serbian police of defacing Jewish sites, as French officials investigate foreign interference

Serbian police have arrested 11 people, accusing them of “inciting hatred” in France and Germany, and linking them to acts that include placing pigs’ heads near mosques and defacing Jewish sites.

The arrests came days after French prosecutors said foreign interference was probably to blame for a spate of provocative acts that had targeted Jewish and Muslim sites in France in recent years, as tensions run high over the war in Gaza. French officials have previously said they were investigating Russia’s role in destabilising operations that have stoked social tensions and sown division in France.

Continue reading...