Should idiotic/ annoying/ sectarian etc users be banned?

RI_RS —

poll

Should idiotic/ annoying/ sectarian etc users be banned?

Yes, they suck.
27% (4 votes)
No, ever heard of freedom of speech?
13% (2 votes)
Keep them for the Lolz
20% (3 votes)
They waste time and energy, don't ban, just stab them between the eyes and gouge their brains out with a cute little mini spade.
7% (1 vote)
Something else
13% (2 votes)
This is not going to be a jaffa cakes option.
20% (3 votes)
Total votes: 15
CAPTCHA
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Forum
General

11 comments

TPOS Mon, 17 Oct 2011 - 18:18

Rawrrs_isarollingstone

ThE pOwEr Of SiLeNcEIt's a hard choice. I like the sound of number 4 :p

Seriously, either 1 or 3

So they should either be banned or kept?
You've pretty much covered all bases there haven't you :p

Lol. Well it depends how idiotic/annoying/sectarian they are.

You need a way to measure the levels, e.g if they insult Islam or a person really badly (like what lolswood said to malik) then first time they should get warnings, if it continues then be banned for a while.

Sometimes its amusing and banning would be extreme.

You Mon, 17 Oct 2011 - 18:23

Rawrrs_isarollingstoneThe policy atm seems to be that they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You' or Ed, and I wanted to know what everyone else thought.

I think that the policy should be refined:

"they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You'."

but then again I have shown great tolerance towards Lollywood and Metallica in general...

LookingToSee Mon, 17 Oct 2011 - 22:26

You

Rawrrs_isarollingstoneThe policy atm seems to be that they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You' or Ed, and I wanted to know what everyone else thought.

I think that the policy should be refined:

"they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You'."

but then again I have shown great tolerance towards Lollywood and Metallica in general...

great tolerance indeed.

i think it should be a case by case thing. and not if they "bother" a certain person, but mroe if they insult someone or Islam....bbbbbbbbuuuuuuuuuuuut. they DO make revvy interesting and are really good revision tools. not tools. revision..euh..thingies.. euh...

TPOS Mon, 17 Oct 2011 - 22:59

Lilly

great tolerance indeed.

i think it should be a case by case thing. and not if they "bother" a certain person, but mroe if they insult someone or Islam....bbbbbbbbuuuuuuuuuuuut. they DO make revvy interesting and are really good revision tools. not tools. revision..euh..thingies.. euh...

revision?

LookingToSee Tue, 18 Oct 2011 - 07:08

ThE pOwEr Of SiLeNcE

Lilly

great tolerance indeed.

i think it should be a case by case thing. and not if they "bother" a certain person, but mroe if they insult someone or Islam....bbbbbbbbuuuuuuuuuuuut. they DO make revvy interesting and are really good revision tools. not tools. revision..euh..thingies.. euh...

revision?

religious knowledge.

The Lamp Tue, 18 Oct 2011 - 17:29

Lilly

You
Rawrrs_isarollingstoneThe policy atm seems to be that they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You' or Ed, and I wanted to know what everyone else thought.

I think that the policy should be refined:

"they're fine to stay until they really bother either 'You'."

but then again I have shown great tolerance towards Lollywood and Metallica in general...

great tolerance indeed.

i think it should be a case by case thing. and not if they "bother" a certain person, but mroe if they insult someone or Islam....bbbbbbbbuuuuuuuuuuuut. they DO make revvy interesting and are really good revision tools. not tools. revision..euh..thingies.. euh...

I went for a fifth option of "Something else", I mean who defines annoying? If someone is dangerously secetarian or wants to stir up hatred and trouble rather than a mature debate, then it might be better to warn them first.
I think banning should be left for the most extreme cases.

Comments are closed on this post.