Submitted by Anonymous1 (not verified) on 13 June, 2010 - 21:55 #31 TheRevivalEditor wrote: a childish responce to my points if you dont have strong arguments or cant refute them so be it; but dont just bang on about the same thing on every topic and when you are questioned u give silly answers.... u called me a British HINDU Muslim in ur rant above!! accusing me of SHIRK wont be taken lightly! It's not childish, it is called sarcasm. Your ideas are so superficial, that my original arguments containing references and academic definitions were way too above you. These simplistic arguments seem to make sense to you - but like the others, you cannot even refute them. Don't you get it? The way you are trying to fuse foreign ideologies with Islam is the problem - you can't draw an arbitrary line in the sand and say we'll fuse democracy and british identities with Islam as they are culturally dominant and most muslims may go along with it as they know no better and have never really looked into the matter - others will take your logic and extend it to systems like devil worship, hinduism, communism and ask why don't you accept them too? If you insist on being British you will also be labelled HinduCommunistDevil Worshippers etc You need to prove that British National Identities are compatible with Islam and respond to the objections in a serious way - not in a childish way by saying - well that's a big objection but I won't believe in it or I'll just follow the Islamic bit and not the kufr bit but I'm still a democrat or British!