Homosexuality...Umm... Is it really that big a deal?

71 posts / 0 new
Last post

ThE pOwEr Of SiLeNcE wrote:
Isha Al-Maghribi wrote:

I know our Deen isn't all that lenient, but is it acceptable under certain circumstances?

Your friendship or being gay?

Neither is allowed imo/afaik

No, the friendship is allowed.
Him being gay isn't.
Ok, I get it.

I was just wondering is homosexuality allowed.....but it isn't. I was just wondering were there any exceptions. But, clearly I'm going a bit....psycho.

Love is a serious mental disease.

Isha Al-Maghribi wrote:

No, the friendship is allowed.

debatable, guess it's a personal opinion

"How many people find fault in what they're reading and the fault is in their own understanding" Al Mutanabbi

Lilly wrote:
MuslimBro wrote:
You wrote:
(@ Lilly - was that community destroyed for homosexuality or for rape? WHen the angels came in the guise of young men, they did not offer them a drink etc, but smashed down the gates in order to get access to them.)

The prophet Lut was sent to a group of people who were infamous for their depraved behavior. The men of the community were known for having sex with other men. Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of Arabic can tell that these verses are talking about men who engaged in consensual sex with other men, eschewing the women who were created for them. Rape is simply not an issue. To suggest that the angels were raped is completely false. The angels were under Allah's divine protection. In fact, when prophet Lut expressed his fear that he couldn't protect his guests from the depraved men of his community, the guests responded that they were angels in disguise and that no harm would befall them. Allah Most High says, "And when Our Messengers came to Lut, he was grieved on their account, and felt himself powerless (to protect) them: but they said: Fear thou not, nor grieve: we are (here) to save thee and thy following, except thy wife: she is of those who lag behind." (Al-Ankabut, 29:33).

Biggrin (Y)


I didn't say that they were raped - just that was the intention of the inhabitants of the place.

That would only be an issue if the question was if any homosexuality taken place was consentual or not. Since they were protected by God that is a moot point and the above refutation lacks weight in this issue as it is refuting not what has been suggested.

The intention to rape is however easy to ascertain from those verses.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

You wrote:
The intention to rape is however easy to ascertain from those verses.

So the people of Lut (as) were destroyed for their intention?

MuslimBro wrote:
You wrote:
The intention to rape is however easy to ascertain from those verses.

So the people of Lut (as) were destroyed for their intention?

Since the angels were protected and were not involved in any sexual activity, is that your position too? But for homosexuality instead of rape?

You're also assuming that this behaviour occurred for the very first time. The people were know for this along with murdering nd robbing travelers.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

Usually Allah doesnt punish for just one sin, but because the people have just pushed it too far, so i guess its a culmunation of all those sins, no point arguing about this.

but homosexuality is wrong..so if we forget my stupid comment, WHAT is the punishment?

Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

MuslimBro wrote:
You wrote:
The intention to rape is however easy to ascertain from those verses.

So the people of Lut (as) were destroyed for their intention?

Is that when the Dead Sea comes into it?

Love is a serious mental disease.

You wrote:
You're also assuming that this behaviour occurred for the very first time.

Yes, I am assuming like I always assume.

In Surat al-'Araf, verses 80-81, Allah Most High says, "We also (sent) Lut: He said to his people: "Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practise your lusts on men in preference to women : ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds."

According to Ibn Kathir's tafsir (exegesis), the above verses show that homosexuality was unknown to humanity until the men of Prophet Lut's tribe manifested this sin by approaching men instead of women. The Prophet, Lut, peace be upon him, went on to express his astonishment that the men of his tribe had forsaken their natural mates, females, to practice their lusts with males. The commentary goes on to describe this practice as ignorance and transgressing the limits.

Yes that is correct about those verses. But the incident with the angels is much more. The words IMO are quite clear.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

Lilly wrote:
but homosexuality is wrong..so if we forget my stupid comment, WHAT is the punishment?

Right now, in the UK, in this world - nothing.

In times gone by it was both tolerated to an extent at some times nd punished - in hanafi fiqh thew punishment is at the discretion of the judge. Meaning it could be anything from no punishment to being put to death.

In saudi it is sort of ignored unless the people try to challenge the government or create a gay pride/solidarity organisation, when it is punished.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

Pages