Dear MPAC UK: You are utter morons!

I decided to go to the website today to see what they were saying.

They seem to be a pretty active place, so a good place to catch up on news, especially comment on George Galloways's victory in the by election in Bradford.

George Galloway is a pretty well liked politician

Instead I come across a smear campaign against the local Labour candidate. I think his main crime was being the Labour candidate standing against George Galloway - he was probably the candidate probably even before George Galloway had announced his intention to stand.

The Labour candidate was Muslim and they saw it fit to slander his character in a dispicable manner without the courage to outright say what their allegations were. Worse, they were not allegations of a political nature, but a personal attack on his credentials as a good Muslim, all without having the guts to say it in as many words.

As a Muslim pressure group, they were acting rather unislamic. Like all the other extremists who go against Islam when trying to push Islam. Hypocritical.

If George Galloway had not stood in this constituency, chances are this same MPAC would have been very supportive of the Labour candidate as another Muslim who can represent us in the bigger picture as a new face who is also Muslim.

Instead Since George Galloway decided to also contest the seat, he no longer fit their vision of being a candidate standing against George Galloway, so they went for character assassination.

Dear MPAC: get a grip. If you want to do something, do it right.

Character assasinations are not the way. Remember that the M in MPAC stands for Muslim. Always ask yourself how Muslim you are being in what you are doing.

Comments

dominic decocco wrote:
//i didnt understand that from the article.//

It wasn't just one article but quite a few on Galloway. If you can't read and deduce facts, it isn't my problem.

This blog is not about galloway but the other contender.

and I found NO articles discussing his policies on your site.

I even linked to the relevant tags on there.

Just slurs, no facts.

Give me exact quotes on the MPAC site and links to the relevant pages where policy is discussed with proof that his views are as such as MPAC states?

The official MPAC twitter twitter account could only link to other sites... and even then it wasnt a convincing argument as what they suggested was not the same as the contents.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

dominic decocco wrote:
// THIS article on the other hand hurts "moderate" muslims who try to care. but totally put them off. im totally put off. i personALLY dont think i'll ever work with MPACUK. just coz of that article.//

How can you be supportive of those who still refuse to apologise for the massacres in Iraq and Afghanistan! What kind of disgusting, unislamic filthy imperialist loving moron are you?

I sense a pattern here.

While the person this is aimed at isnt me, it fits the same pattern.

When you and people around MPAC have nothing to back you up, you just get all attacking of character instead of admitting wrong.

Using buzz words like imperialist (or an even more beloved one of yours: zionist) does not turn your wrong into right.

I note that the only proof provided of that candidate supporting the war in IRaq is you saying so and the proof of his support of the Afghanistan war is a video with him saying that the troops should be withdrawn.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

Lilly wrote:
you seem to be missing a massive point here. we are talking about a PARTICULAR article. we feel this article was written for no reason. and cotributes NOTHING. "You" believes this article is character assasination. i might do so if today wasnt the first time i came across this term.

so...beard-measuring-brothers are the majority eh? so... Muslimhands, muslim aids, and all those other muslim charities are run by who? the minority?

what the flip are you talking about?! im talking about the "shut the fiqh up" article. how am i a (let me quote) "disgusting, unislamic filthy imperialist loving moron" wouah man. these ae some harsh words right there.

you're basically saying "shut the eff up" to fiqh. the question is HOW is that NOT offensive? the word fiqh has a specific meaning. so dont tell me "in this context it means..."

It was a character assassination! We are holding our leaders to account, something the salaf used to do and the sahabah and we are exposing the truth in order to stop oppression!

Your post is ridiculous as Muslim Hands and Muslim Aid are charities NOT people! Why don't you try going to those mental blackholes they call mosques now and try and see what the Muslims are coming out with?

NO ONE is saying SHUT THE F UP to Fiqh, that is a lie and you know that.

dominic decocco wrote:
It was a character assassination!

Good that you admit that. Finally. The truth from people probably afiliated with MPAC? who'd have thunk it?

dominic decocco wrote:
We are holding our leaders to account

No you're not.

and no, the salaf didnt do character assassination like this, you dirty their name by suggesting so. It is a disgrace that you are following the footsteps of the sahabahs when doing such acts because that is a bare faced lie.

The Islamic way is to hide sins unless they will have a detrimental impact on others. Instead you use innuendo to suggest and potentially make up sins (as so far none of the claims are proven) in order to demolish someone you see as an opposition to your agendas.

"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" - David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. 13 May 2015.

Pages